Рациональность. Что это, почему нам ее не хватает и чем она важна - Стивен Пинкер

Norman, A. 2021. Mental immunity: Infectious ideas, mind parasites, and the search for a better way to think. New York: HarperCollins.

Nyhan, B. 2013. Building a better correction: Three lessons from new research on how to counter misinformation. Columbia Journalism Review. http://archives.cjr.org/united_states_project/building_a_better_correction_nyhan_new_misperception_research.ph.

Nyhan, B. 2018. Fake news and bots may be worrisome, but their political power is overblown. New York Times, Feb. 13. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/13/upshot/fake-news-and-bots-may-be-worrisome-but-their-political-power-is-overblown.html.

Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. 2012. Misinformation and fact-checking: Research findings from social science. Washington, DC: New America Foundation.

Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. 2019. The roles of information deficits and identity threat in the prevalence of misperceptions. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 29, 222–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2018.1465061.

O’Keefe, S. M. 2020. One in three Americans would not get COVID-19 vaccine. Gallup, Aug. 7. https://news.gallup.com/poll/317018/one-three-americans-not-covid-vaccine.aspx.

Open Science Collaboration. 2015. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716.

Paresky, P., Haidt, J., Strossen, N., & Pinker, S. 2020. The New York Times surrendered to an outrage mob. Journalism will suffer for it. Politico, May 14. https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/05/14/bret-stephens-new-york-times-outrage-backlash-256494.

Parker, A. M., Bruine de Bruin, W., Fischhoff, B., & Weller, J. 2018. Robustness of decision-making competence: Evidence from two measures and an 11-year longitudinal study. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 31, 380–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2059.

Pashler, H., & Wagenmakers, E. J. 2012. Editors’ introduction to the special section on replicability in psychological science: A crisis of confidence? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 528–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612465253.

Paulos, J. A. 1988. Innumeracy: Mathematical illiteracy and its consequences. New York: Macmillan.

Payne, J. L. 2004. A history of force: Exploring the worldwide movement against habits of coercion, bloodshed, and mayhem. Sandpoint, ID: Lytton.

Pearl, J. 2000. Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Pearl, J., & Mackenzie, D. 2018. The book of why: The new science of cause and effect. New York: Basic Books.

Pennycook, G., Cannon, T. D., & Rand, D. G. 2018. Prior exposure increases perceived accuracy of fake news. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147, 1865–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000465.

Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. 2020. On the belief that beliefs should change according to evidence: Implications for conspiratorial, moral, paranormal, political, religious, and science beliefs. Judgment and Decision Making, 15, 476–98. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/a7k96.

Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Seli, P., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. 2012. Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief. Cognition, 123, 335–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.03.003.

Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. 2020a. The cognitive science of fake news. https://psyarxiv.com/ar96c.

Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. 2020b. Who falls for fake news? The roles of bullshit receptivity, overclaiming, familiarity, and analytic thinking. Journal of Personality, 88, 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12476.

Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life. 2009. Many Americans mix multiple faiths. Washington, DC: Pew Research Cente. https://www.pewforum.org/2009/12/09/many-americans-mix-multiple-faiths/.

Pinker, S. 1994/2007. The language instinct. New York: HarperCollins. Pinker, S. 1997/2009. How the mind works. New York: W. W. Norton.

Pinker, S. 1999/2011. Words and rules: The ingredients of language. New York: HarperCollins.

Pinker, S. 2002/2016. The blank slate: The modern denial of human nature. New York: Penguin.

Pinker, S. 2007. The stuff of thought: Language as a window into human nature. New York: Viking.

Pinker, S. 2010. The cognitive niche: Coevolution of intelligence, sociality, and language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 8993–99. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0914630107.

Pinker, S. 2011. The better angels of our nature: Why violence has declined. New York: Viking.

Pinker, S. 2012. Why are states so red and blue? New York Times, Oct. 24. http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/10/24/why-are-states-so-red-and-blue/?_r=0.

Pinker, S. 2015. Rock star psychologist Steven Pinker explains why #thedress looked white, not blue. Forbes, Feb. 28. https://www.forbes.com/sites/matthewherper/2015/02/28/psychologist-and-author-stephen-pinker-explains-thedress/.

Pinker, S. 2018. Enlightenment now: The case for reason, science, humanism, and progress. New York: Viking.

Pinker, S., & Mehler, J., eds. 1988. Connections and symbols. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Pinker, S., & Prince, A. 2013. The nature of human concepts: Evidence from an unusual source. In S. Pinker, ed., Language, cognition, and human nature: Selected articles. New York: Oxford University Press.

Plato. 399–390 BCE/2002. Euthyphro (G. M. A. Grube, trans.). In J. M. Cooper, ed., Plato: Five dialogues — Euthyphro, Apology, Crito, Meno, Phaedo (2nd ed.). Indianapolis: Hackett.

Polderman, T. J. C., Benyamin, B., de Leeuw, C. A., Sullivan, P. F., van Bochoven, A., et al. 2015. Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies. Nature Genetics, 47, 702–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3285.

Popper, K. R. 1983. Realism and the aim of science. London: Routledge.

Poundstone, W. 1992. Prisoner’s dilemma: John von Neumann, game theory, and the puzzle of the bomb. New York: Anchor.

President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. 2016. Report to the President: Forensic science in criminal courts: ensuring scientific validity of feature-comparison methods. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/PCAST/pcast_forensic_science_report_final.pdf.

Priest, G. 2017. Logic: A very short introduction (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

Proctor, R. N. 2000. The Nazi war on cancer. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Pronin, E., Lin, D. Y., & Ross, L. 2002. The bias blind spot: Perceptions of bias in self versus others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 369–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202286008.

Purves, D., & Lotto, R. B. 2003. Why we see what we do: An empirical theory of vision. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.

Rachels, J., & Rachels, S. 2010. The elements of moral philosophy (6th ed.). Columbus, OH: McGraw-Hill.

Raemon. 2017. What exactly is the «Rationality Community?» LessWrong, Apr. 9. https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/s8yvtCbbZW2S4WnhE/what-exactly-is-the-rationality-community.

Railton, P. 1986. Moral realism. Philosophical Review, 95, 163–207. https://doi.org/10.2307/2185589.

Rauch, J. 2018. The constitution of knowledge. National Affairs, Fall 2018. https://www.nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/the-constitution-of-knowledge.

Rauch, J. 2021. The constitution of knowledge: A defense of truth. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

Richardson, J., Smith, A., Meaden, S., & Flip Creative. 2020. Thou shalt not commit logical fallacies. https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/.

Richardson, L. F. 1960. Statistics of deadly quarrels. Pittsburgh: Boxwood Press.

Ridley, M. 1997. The origins of virtue: Human instincts and the evolution of cooperation. New York: Viking.

Ridley, M. 2010. The rational optimist: How prosperity evolves. New York: Harper-Collins.

Ritchie, H. 2018. Causes of death. Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/causes-of-death.

Ritchie, S. 2015. Intelligence: All that matters. London: Hodder & Stoughton.

Ropeik, D. 2010. How